Home
Current reviews
Archives
Reviews by title
Reviews by author
Interviews
Contact Onyx
Discussion
forum
|
|
Onyx reviews: Our Kind of Traitor by John le Carré
It's no secret that the Cold War has been over for a long time. For young adults, the struggle for dominance between the East and the West is
almost ancient history. Where is a novelist who made his name writing about
espionage and counter-espionage between the superpowers to turn? The surprising
answer for John le Carré is: Russia. There is more way than one for a
country to exert influence over the rest of the world. Instead of a nuclear arms
race, le Carré posits a financial battle. Long-time couple Perry Makepeace
and Gail Perkins are at something of a
crossroads. Perry is quitting his post as an English
Literature tutor at Oxford to start teaching underprivileged secondary education
students. Gail, a lawyer with a promising future, wonders where their
relationship is heading. While on vacation in Antigua, they meet
Dmitri, aka Dima, a Russian "businessman" who learns that Perry is a talented
tennis player. He insists they play at the resort's courts. Dima is a force of
nature, and Gail and Perry get a glimpse behind his curtain when armed guards
try to search their bags before allowing them onto the court. Perry declines, thereby gaining Dima's respect. The tennis
match (one of several in the book) is more than simply a game—it's a way for Dima to size Perry
up. It's also a surreal spectacle witnessed by the
grimmest audience imaginable. Dima is all about "fair play," chiding
Perry when he thinks the younger man is going easy on him. Shortly after the match, which Perry wins,
Dima passes a note to Perry and Gail saying he wants them to contact British Intelligence on his behalf. Turns out he's a
world-class money launderer for the
Russian mob and he wants to defect. He's part of the old guard, being edged out
of his position. He's certain that his colleagues are spying on him and one of
his closest friends and allies was murdered recently. Believing that he and his
family are next on the chopping block, he sees British Intelligence as his
best bet. They share his sense of fair play, he thinks. In return for access to
his wealth of insider information about illegal transactions that span
continents, all he wants is a safe haven. Gail's maternal instincts kick in when she sees how sad
and lost the children
in Dima's extended family are. This group includes Dima's wife Tamara, who has
become a deeply disturbed religious fanatic since being tortured in prison,
their twin sons, two young girls orphaned by the murder of Dima's ally, and
Natasha, a stunningly beautiful but taciturn teenager, Dima's daughter with
another woman. While Perry entertains the boys by teaching them cricket, Gail
tends to the girls, forming a strong connection wih Natasha, whose stepmother
despises her. Perry and Gail are excited by the adventure that has been dropped in their
laps. They're
too intrigued to be properly frightened by the gravity of the situation. Gail and Perry don't
have contacts at MI6, but Perry finds a way to get a message via one of
his Oxford colleagues.
Much of the first half of the novel is taken up by their debriefing over the course of several days. This is the most fascinating part of the
story—readers get to know the young couple through the way they
interact and how they choose to respond to questions. Sometimes
they defer to each other, sometimes they step on each other, and occasionally
they annoy each other. Their
questioners have a strategy that doesn't always align with the
way Gail and Perry want to tell the story, which sometimes frustrates them. It's a different kind of tennis match, one where Gail and Perry don't
understand all the rules. To complicate matters, Perry and Gail each have information
the other does not possess, which strains their relationship. Perry
wants to protect Gail, but he is reprimanded by his interrogators for presuming
to speak on her behalf and make critical decisions for her. Dima has made it
clear that he wants both of them involved. The
intelligence business isn't neat and tidy, like in a James Bond movie, with
everyone working toward a common goal. Gail and Perry believe that their
handlers and the people they represent will use the information they provide to
everyone's best interests. However, petty politics get in the way. Hector Meredith, the aging
operative in charge of their debriefing, is working without official approval.
Until recently, he was sidelined from the agency, being reinstated only after
winning a highly publicized court battle with a financier who tried to ruin his
family business. His stridency and zealotry have placed him on the outs with
many of his peers and superiors at MI6. He's an idealist who has no use for
people who are willing to compromise their values on a case-by-case basis. It's interesting to speculate whether Dima's story would have been
different if his file had landed on someone else's desk—if another agent
had taken an interest in him. As shown on the recent television series Rubicon,
intelligence work can be mind-numbing,tedious work, with agents often not seeing
the real-world repercussions of the information they amass. People operate at cross purposes and
politics (both internal to the agency and on the larger stage) often control the way cases are
handled—or not handled. Powerful, well-connected, effectively protected
people might be implicated by Dima's information. One of the banks he wants to
expose is scheduled to release
billions of dollars into the cash-strapped British economy, and some within MI6
favor turning a blind eye to the source of the much-needed money instead of
trying to uproot the shadow economy that operates beyond the borders of any
individual nation. If someone wants to set up a luxury hotel in the
Baltics and use its fictitious income to launder money, who's being harmed? It's
just money, neither good nor evil, they argue. The financial wheelings and
dealings involved comprise a complicated scheme. le Carré does his best
to dole the details out in small bites to make them more palatable to readers, but it can
still be heavy going at times. After the debriefing, the novel shifts gears as
Luke, their day-to-day contact in the agency, and Hector concoct a plan to extract Dima and his family.
Luke's career was in freefall until he was assigned to Gail and Perry, having
been returned to the home
office in shame after his extramarital affair with a coworker was exposed while
he was being held captive by a Colombian warlord. Though aspects of his
character and story are interesting, readers never get a good feel for who he
is, or why he acts as he does. He's struggling to hold onto his wife, but he
falls in love with Gail, an unrequited and impossible relationship. Gail and
Perry are forced to become amateur spies because Dima is only comfortable
meeting with them. Luke and Hector give them rudimentary training in spy craft,
but mostly they're taught what not to do—how to behave naturally so they won't betray
the fact that they know they're under observation once they go into the
field. Their initial adventures as novice spies are exciting, but once the story
moves to a chalet in the Bernese Oberland the book founders, a victim of the
type of tedium that is probably part and parcel of most spy missions but which
doesn't make for terribly interesting reading, especially coming as it does at a
point where most novels begin to ramp up the tension. It's like a balloon
inflated to the verge of bursting that suddenly deflates. Iit is
never entirely clear who le Carré is referring to in the book's
title. Its final
moments make it clear that someone knows about and is operating against
Hector's team. However, the finale is so shocking and abrupt that
readers are left with a host of unanswered questions. A denouement of some sort would have
been nice.
Web site and all contents © Copyright Bev Vincent
2007-2011. All rights reserved
|
|